Thursday, February 27, 2020

Security Design Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Security Design - Research Paper Example that critically need fool proof security solutions include battlefield defences systems, money transaction system, international telephone system, etc. With the lapse of time, system complexities in such environments are rapidly increasing and traditional security paradigms are becoming insufficient. The authors remark that although the â€Å"common V model† (108) framework of determining a system’s lifecycle can still be used as a general starting point, systems thinking must be inducted widely. In order to develop and implement systems thinking to the sphere of complex systems, the systems designer must have a thorough understanding of his/her operational environment. Understanding the subsystem components, hierarchy situation, functional constraints, etc. are also equally important. To achieve this, Alston and Campbell also suggested that the systems designer should develop a range of potential solutions (110). This action can be achieved when divergent thinking and convergent thinking are coalesced with the help of spray diagrams, multiple cause diagrams, etc. Next, systems level designs and techniques must be produced. After that, the implementation scheme must be verified with the help of the techniques like software and hardware testing, validation, etc. Finally, the designing team must adhere to the most flexible â€Å"Systems Engineering policies, processes and tool sets† (Alston and Campbell, 112) that can be used and modified during security emergencies. Alston, Ian and Simon Campbell. â€Å"A systems engineering approach for security system design.† Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Emerging Security Technologies. New York: IEEE, 2010. 107-112.

Monday, February 10, 2020

Effects of Mass Media Violence on Violent Behavior Research Paper

Effects of Mass Media Violence on Violent Behavior - Research Paper Example Therefore, a foundation must be established on which the arguments of both sides can be viewed impartially, and through which we can reach a valid understanding of the issue of mass-media violence. What makes this difficult is that the criteria of judgment for the question is political, based on the vision or ideal of society that one wants to see manifest. To illustrate this, it is important to start with the opposite, teachers of non-violence such as the Dalai Lama, Mahatma Gandhi, Nelson Mandela, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., etc. and consider what their ideals of a non-violent society are, as well as why they consider violence so fundamental to be opposed. For example, if we judge the question of mass-media violence against the goals of Satyagraha as taught by Mahatma Gandhi, and the vision of society he sought to develop, we might have a very different conclusion than if we judge the question by the values of Bush, Cheney, and the administration that led the United States to war & torture in Iraq and Afghanistan. To reduce this division further, a society that commands the world’s largest military, has over 800 foreign military bases, and is conducting wars on multiple battlefronts might not only have a different goal as a society than a country like Tibet, once a Buddhist kingdom with thousands of monasteries ruled by a reincarnate monk, but the societies might also have very different actual perceptions of what violence is, and tolerance to it. Jains in the ancient world were renowned for sweeping the road in front of themselves when walking and wearing masks to insure that they did not injure any insect while traveling or breathing. A society based on this level of sensitivity to violence may view mass-media imagery of violent behavior in a very different way to our society that has been desensitized to it for years. Thus, we must approach this as